Research Archives - Visible Alpha

Visible Alpha Research

The Visible Alpha AI Monitor aggregates publicly-traded U.S. technology companies, providing a comprehensive measure of the current state and projected growth of the core AI industry. This encompasses the AI-exposed revenues for companies that are building AI infrastructure and capabilities for both enterprises and consumers.

Investors may use the Visible Alpha AI Monitor to generate new ideas to capture growth emanating from the core AI industry, as well as to evaluate the potential AI exposure of technology stocks in their existing portfolios.

We have identified specific line items that capture potential growth of AI-related revenues that are available in the Visible Alpha Insights platform (see the goals, objectives, and methodology of the AI Monitor at the bottom of this page).

Key Takeaways

  • AI-exposed revenues are expected to grow by almost $250 billion, from $382 billion at the end of 2022 to $627 billion at the end of 2025, driven overwhelmingly by analysts’ upward revisions of over $150 billion to AI-exposed revenues for Nvidia.
  • Among all the companies in the AI Monitor, AI-exposed revenues in 2023 make up 24.5% of total revenues. Of the 24.5%, the majority (82%) is coming from the 10 largest firms by AI-exposed revenue.
  • More than 50% of the smaller-cap AI stocks underperformed year to date, while eight out of the 10 largest AI-exposed revenue generators have driven strong outperformance.

Figure 1: AI growth and performance overview

AI growth and performance overview

Source: Visible Alpha consensus (December 12, 2023). Stock price data courtesy of FactSet. Current stock prices are as of the market close on December 11, 2023. TOP 10 = IBM, Qualcomm, Oracle, Microsoft, Intel, Amazon, Adobe, Dell, Nvidia, Google. These firms currently have the largest revenue-generating segments geared to AI.

Current AI Landscape

At the moment, there is an arms race to convert data centers to accelerated computing to support AI and machine learning. As a result of the unexpectedly strong demand this year from cloud service providers, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has seen the sum of its estimates over the next three years increase an astonishing $155 billion since January 2023. Meanwhile, the aggregate of the other nine largest AI-exposed revenue generators is expected to decline over $75 billion, driven by downward revisions to the revenue outlooks for AWS, Google Cloud, Azure IaaS/PaaS, and Qualcomm. Given the magnitude of Nvidia’s projected increases, is the growth in this part of the stack now priced in? As we move up the stack, what companies may begin to see their revenue explode, like Nvidia has, or possibly implode as AI takes hold?

Nvidia has been dominating the AI landscape, which has led it to drive the AI-exposed revenue outlook for the 10 largest AI-exposed revenue generators and the overall Visible Alpha AI Monitor. However, large and small companies have been investing in AI. Will these investments impact the broader industry and create opportunities for a wider array of firms to grow their AI revenues and emerge as new leaders?  Which companies will be the winners and which ones may see their business models and profits decline?

Figure 2: Top 10 breakdown of AI-exposed revenue expectations

Top 10 breakdown of AI exposed revenue expectations

Source: Visible Alpha consensus (December 12, 2023). TOP 10 = IBM, Qualcomm, Oracle, Microsoft, Intel, Amazon, Adobe, Dell, Nvidia, Google. These firms currently have the largest revenue-generating segments geared to AI. Based on higher analyst counts, we are using the non-GAAP revenue number for Oracle and Ansys.

Download the Excel Worksheet

Performance Summary

Currently, the Visible Alpha AI Monitor universe of 62 publicly-traded U.S. companies is 82% weighted to the 10 largest companies, with the remaining 18% dispersed among 52 companies.

On a market-cap weighted and AI-exposed-revenue weighted basis, the Visible Alpha AI Monitor was driven by substantial stock price outperformance (vs. the S&P 500 index) of the largest companies this year. In addition, the smaller companies were meaningful underperformers (vs. the S&P 500 index), especially on an AI-exposed-revenue weighting.

On an equal-weighted basis, the AI Monitor would have generated significantly lower return when compared to the market-cap and AI-exposed-revenue weighted aggregations this year, driven by the drag of a lower return generated by the 52 remaining names. Stock selection was an important dimension among the 52 names, as more than 50% of the companies underperformed the index.

Top 10

Based on an analysis of the 10 largest players from January of this year, 2025 revenue forecasts for AI-exposed revenue segments increased $40 billion in total. However, $70 billion of that is from Nvidia, which means that the rest of the Top 10 saw revenue estimates decline almost $30 billion in aggregate. This was driven by lower expectations for AWS, Google Cloud, and Qualcomm QCT. However, though expectations came down for these companies, stock performance was strong for eight of the Top 10 companies, the exceptions being Qualcomm and IBM, both of which appear to have lower AI-exposed revenue.

The Rest (smaller contributors)

The remaining list of 52 companies may serve as a good place for investors to discover new ideas by surfacing expanding new players. While smaller companies in aggregate have not performed as well as the Top 10, there have been some clear outperformers relative to others.

Among the smaller firms, revenue growth expectations are very mixed. Strong double-digit revenue growth is expected at some firms, while others are seeing estimates decline. These dynamics may help investors identify emerging trends in the space. We have already seen that to be true this year with Palantir, C3 AI, Samsara, and MongoDB delivering very strong outperformance (vs. the S&P 500 index), while more than half of the smaller companies in the AI Monitor substantially underperformed the index. Rackspace, TTEC, Thoughtworks, and Liveperson fell by more than 50%.

The role of Nvidia

The magnitude of growth baked into Nvidia, combined with this year’s over 200% stock performance, has been absolutely staggering. Looking further out to the end of 2027, Visible Alpha consensus for Nvidia revenue has exploded by nearly $100 billion from a modest $33 billion in January to now a whopping $129 billion currently projected in Data Center revenues alone.

Nvidia has driven the total AI Monitor and the Top 10 companies, as analysts began to anticipate enormous growth to come from transitioning data centers to accelerated computing to support AI. Nvidia made up 30% of the 85% aggregated market-cap weighted stock performance of the Visible Alpha AI Monitor. Looking at only the Top 10 market-cap weighted stock performance, Nvidia was close to 40% of the 65% aggregated return. Given the strength of both the revisions to future growth and the stock performance that followed, to what extent has the strength in Nvidia’s fundamentals already been priced in?

Figure 3: Nvidia’s Data Center revenue estimates and revisions

Nvidia Data Center revenue estimates and revisions

Source: Visible Alpha consensus (December 12, 2023)

Figure 4: AI Monitor detailed breakdown

AI Monitor detailed breakdown

Source: Visible Alpha consensus (December 12, 2023). TOP 10 = IBM, Qualcomm, Oracle, Microsoft, Intel, Amazon, Adobe, Dell, Nvidia, Google. These firms currently have the largest revenue-generating segments geared to AI. Based on higher analyst counts, we are using the non-GAAP revenue number for Oracle and Ansys.

Download the Excel Worksheet

Final Thoughts

While this year has clearly been the Year of Nvidia, Palantir and C3 AI have seen their exposure to AI translate into meaningful stock outperformance relative to the S&P 500 index. However, for many firms it is not clear how AI-exposure will impact business models.

For example, Meta Platforms is investing in AI and has seen its stock rise 170% in 2023, but it is not clear how their AI strategy will show up in their numbers and at what pace. On a three-year forward basis, Meta’s AI-exposed revenue growth, as seems to be reflected in Reality Labs, is only expected to be 6%, but it’s obscured by the other businesses in this segment.

There are numerous such examples where the AI-exposed revenue growth projections and the stock performance do not appear correlated. As the AI story unfolds over the next few years, will the transparency of AI drivers improve and drive stock outperformance?

As 2023 comes to a close, will this year’s best performers, like Nvidia and Palantir, continue to drive the Visible Alpha AI Monitor in 2024 or will we see a rotation into less appreciated firms where the growth may not yet be priced in?



AI Monitor Goals and Objectives

The objective of the Visible Alpha AI Monitor is to show the investment community which companies are likely to drive AI going forward. As the world embraces AI and its applications to enterprise workflows and our daily lives, big questions exist about how AI’s impact on company business models will unfold over the next 3-5 years. AI can potentially free people from tedious work to enable more focus on critical workflows that require human creativity and analysis.

A primary goal of the Visible Alpha AI Monitor is to show which U.S. companies and specific line items we are keeping an eye on as the embryonic AI theme emerges across company fundamentals and begins to scale broadly across the economy. We are monitoring how AI may be reflected in the numbers and which companies may be benefitting more or less. This universe attempts to be comprehensive and to show investors the dynamics of both the large and smaller U.S. players. Additionally, it aims to help investors identify new names that may be smaller and less covered, but potentially growing and emerging more quickly.

AI Monitor Methodology

Using Visible Alpha’s comprehensive database of detailed estimates pulled directly from sell-side analysts’ spreadsheet models, we have assembled an aggregation with an initial universe of 62 publicly-traded companies that are contributing to the infrastructure and broad scaling of AI capabilities. This monitor aims to provide a current and future snapshot as to where AI-related revenues are and are not growing across each of these 62 companies, and particularly the ten largest.

We have aggregated the revenues of specific business segments at firms that are driving the wider AI trend. For larger firms, we have attempted to pinpoint where in their revenue model AI is driving growth. For some smaller firms, we are simply incorporating 100% of revenues. The AI-exposed revenue lines we identify are intended to be used as a proxy for monitoring the growth of each company’s AI business. Given both lack of discrete company disclosures and how intertwined AI and conventional technologies and services can be, these lines should not be taken as exact quantifications of AI revenues, but are, we believe, the best systematic approximation available.

For Visible Alpha subscribers, details of these companies can all be found within the Visible Alpha Insights platform. Each company included in the monitor has coverage by at least four sell-side analysts. In addition, given the quickly evolving state of the AI space, these line items are subject to change and may shift significantly over time. We plan to refresh the data on an ongoing basis and provide regular updates.


This is the third part and final part of this series. 

In the U.S., publicly traded companies routinely reward shareholders with cash payouts. There are two types of common payout vehicles:

  • Cash dividend per share
  • Share repurchases

Read more

This is the second part of a three-part series. 

In the U.S., publicly traded companies routinely reward shareholders with cash payouts. There are two types of common payout vehicles:

  • Cash dividend per share
  • Share repurchases

Read more

This is the first part of a three-part series. 

In the U.S., publicly traded companies routinely reward shareholders with cash payouts. There are two types of common payout vehicles:

  • Cash dividend per share
  • Share repurchases

Read more

The Financial Information Services Division (FISD) of the Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA) established the Alternative Data Council in January 2019. Ihsan Saracgil, Senior Principal Data Scientist at Visible Alpha, was a founding member of the council and has been an integral part of their most recent development: Data Descriptions Guidelines.

Read more

The last-mile food delivery industry has become a market worth $46.2 billion in CY21, according to the Visible Alpha consensus. Visible Alpha’s granular consensus data offers a unique, bottom-up perspective on the industry, which has seen its revenue grow at an aggregate CAGR of 39% between 2020-2022. The Covid-19 pandemic, with its lockdowns and social distancing norms, gave a boost to the industry with analysts projecting it to generate $119.5 billion in revenue by 2026, growing from $46.2 billion in 2021 at a CAGR of 21%. Over the past few years, investment has continued to pour into the space. Recent IPOs – DoorDash in December 2020, Deliveroo in March 2021, Zomato in July 2021, and Grab in December 2021 – further illustrate the excitement and uncertainty that surrounds this sector.

Read more

Tesla’s growth and margin profile is more aligned with a technology company than a traditional automobile manufacturer, which may explain why the market believes the company should trade at a relatively large premium versus its peers.

Download Now: Tesla Whitepaper

Read more

What are the key revenue drivers in social media, and how does the market react to surprising new information about them? Visible Alpha’s analysis of earnings announcement surprises in social media using detailed KPI estimates that drive revenue, in addition to top and bottom-line forecasts, highlights that user growth information has a large impact on stock returns following earnings announcements.

Through our analysis, we find that user growth is a key revenue driver to unlocking the outcome in social media’s earnings announcements. The consensus closely tracks this revenue driver, which accounts for half the revenue growth historically, and surprises on the announcement day are not as common as other KPIs we analyzed. Beating or missing the consensus on user growth yields outsized returns on the announcement day: we estimate 2.8% excess daily return following the announcement per 1% user growth surprise. The strong earnings response coefficient on user growth exceeds that of EPS, revenue, or the monetization part of the revenue handily.

fig cropped

The figure above marks each KPI surprise and color-codes the excess stock return following the earnings announcement. The dashed line shows that user growth and monetization surprises are negatively correlated; a positive surprise in one component of revenue provides some buffer for a weaker surprise in the other component. The top 25% of returns in the sample (green dots) tend to happen when user growth beats expectations, while the worst 25% returns (red dots) happen when user growth misses.

The impact of user growth on social media returns is not a statistical wonder; it is rooted in the social media business model popularized by Facebook. When we break down revenue growth on a timeline, we find that social media companies tend to start with rapid user growth and tepid monetization. Over time user growth slows while monetization via ads or subscription fees steadily ramps up. Therefore, user growth is a sneak-peek into the future path of revenues, not just the current period. An unexpected user growth acceleration or slowdown might convey information about future cash flows and valuation of social media companies, making it a strong predictor of announcement day returns.

While KPI surprises do a good job of explaining announcement date returns, weekly returns following the announcement do not show a predictable drift in the direction of surprise, or a reversal for that matter. This points at market efficiency; new information coming in the earnings announcement is incorporated into returns the same day.

Our approach allows us to go beyond saying that a company has had a good quarter because the reported EPS exceeded the consensus expectations. We aim to provide a deeper diagnosis on why the company had a good quarter: was it because more users signed on to a social media platform than anticipated, or was it because the company charged higher for ads shown to users on its platform than analysts thought it could? We assess the impact of unexpected surprise in each KPI on stock returns following the announcement to evaluate whether some KPIs matter more to the market than others.

Download the industry report to learn more >

Read more

Do you ever wonder if you’ve overpaid for a broker’s services? What if a misalignment in your spend versus consumption cost you an extra $75,000? Wouldn’t a budgeting tool be helpful in better understanding your month-to-month spend? 

Read more

Analyst and consensus estimates revisions are highly sought after by investment professionals, who typically obtain estimates revisions by either collecting and ingesting analyst spreadsheet models directly or by leveraging a third-party service provider to process the models. In the latter approach, investors typically receive analyst and consensus estimates two weeks after earnings and two weeks prior to the next earnings announcement, summarizing any revisions made.

Read more